![]() ![]() Not for fastrawviewer, it actually shows the real raw file. Of course the thumbnails use the embedded jpg, but I think that applies to most image tools. Please see screenshot for settings for RAW image handling - hope this helps. It also does a different conversion than was done by the camera so don't be surprised if the resulting JPG looks different from the out of camera JPG even if you don't tell Batch Convert to make any changes. The Batch Convert tool does let you change the image size and even appearance so it is a useful tool for use with RAW images. I often hear that XnViewMP would be a better match for my needs. Works well for me, except that while it is 'color aware', it is not 'color managed'. As far as I can tell the only thing FastStone can actually do to a RAW file is to use the Batch Convert Tool to convert it into a JPG. 1 Gerry Pasternack wrote: I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing. I have tried various things, including reading the manual. ![]() If you select a RAW file and edit it you are actually editing the embedded JPG. XnView review With a powerful built-in editor, batch processing and Photoshop plugin support, XnView is a complete photographer's toolkit Reviews By Sofia Wycilik-Wilson published 27 July. I would like to know how you are editing the RAW file in FastStone. You do need to adjust the RAW settings to get past working on the embedded jpeg - but TBH I have only used that very occasionally. I am a long time user of FastStone and find that for both RAW and JPEG editing it provides 99.9% of all my needs. How do Faststone and XnViewMP compare from a feature and performance standpoint? Works well for me, except that while it is "color aware", it is not "color managed". I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |